I think you'll want to see this

**Rotary_Boy** · 02-22-2012 03:41 PM

Call of Duty Community: Robert Bowling doesn't even like MW3. ... I don't know what to think of this, but i think it has to do a lot with the problems that are going on in call of duty. I don't know if many of you know who uncle thunder is (if you don't check him out 402THUNDER402's Channel - YouTube ), but i agree an almost all of his opinions. If they would bother to put even more time testing they're games there wouldn't be as much problems as there actually are. I could try to understand that it's not easy developing such game since it's the most played in the world but they make as much money to hire people to test or work out they're problems. For those of you who didn't know, Modern Warfare 3 alone in 16 days made Activision 1 billions dollars. I think you could do something with that money. I don't know, this is my opinion, would like to hear yours.

**XxGiRL_PWNSxX** · 02-22-2012 03:46 PM

Moved to MW3 General Discussion

**VocalGorilla** · 02-23-2012 06:24 AM

I would be interested to hear what the problems you are having are? I personally think it is a pretty solid game. There are a few issues but I do not think there is anything major. Well nothing that stops me enjoying the game.

**Rotary_Boy** · 02-24-2012 11:18 AM

I actually don't have major issues with the game. Maybe lag compensation which is ridiculous and the spawns, at least on team deathmatch since that's all i've been playing in this cod. Aside from that i can't think anything of the top of my head for now...maybe when i play again i'll remember. But with the first post what i meant was if they would test the game more we wouldn't have to deal with so much bs at the release of every cod. An example the Fmg-9 Akimbo. The first time i encountered this gun in the game it killed me from like 10 miles away and with such precision and by that i mean it killed me in a second. Even with an assault rifle the shot would have been difficult for him to kill me. And that's my point, they have to wait for the gamers to give so much negative feedback to it for them to do something about it. If they were gamers and played enough they would notice that, i think like gamers if what happened tome happened to one of them i think they would say like "Dawm that's just crazy, that needs fixing". And that's what i mean. i can understand that call of duty is the most played game ever right now and the servers must have crazy loads, but with the more reason they should put more effort since it's such a big franchise. Make those persons who are fans happy. Games are for having fun, not that i don't have any while playing but sometimes there's so much bs that i know many people rage, and that kind of sucks :/.

**VocalGorilla** · 02-25-2012 04:22 AM

I agree with you that is disappointing that some people rage at the game. In fairness the game has caused me to pass out from sheer anger. However, I have had at least 5 or 6 patches; to me this shows that they are at least trying to fix some of what people want fixed. Finally, they will never be able please everybody; for example there are just as many people who love the FMG's as hate them with a burning passion.

**Rotary_Boy** · 02-26-2012 01:10 PM

That is true i agree with you. And remember i told that i would play and tell you other things that bother me....DEATHSTREAKS!!!!!!!!!!....most annoying thing they could have created. I've been playing since the modern warfare days, I played and got my ass kicked i practiced and watch and learned, i became a better player. Things i didn't do: Fall on my butt while still shooting my primary and get shot and refuse to die, I didn't die six times and on the last death blow up like some stupid suicide bomber!!!...This upset most. This do NOT make you a better player. Experience and practice do.